13 Comments
User's avatar
Chrissi's avatar

Great article.

I'm not Jewish ,but very much- as you say- now an October 6 Christian , no longer a September 12 one

My biblical study and knowledge relies on the Tanakh and how Jesus understood and interpreted the Scriptures .

Ruth 1:16-18.

Ezekiel Detroit's avatar

Bless you for your aliyah. It is a sad day today. I have been angry for three years. You make me hopeful.

Bonnie B's avatar

On our way. :-)

Vania J Ingold's avatar

I would like to move to Israel as a non Jewish person. I now wear my Star of David every day. I support Israel and wore black today to honour 7th October.

Aimee Samana's avatar

Where can we get guidance on the process?

Yonah E's avatar

Please feel free to message me and I can send you all the resources.

Deborah Taylor's avatar

I desperately want to make Aliyah more than anything in this world, but am unable at this moment due to financial hardship & caring for ill mother in her late 80's who is unable to travel. BUT G-D! SOON, I PRAY.

Michal's avatar

Exactly, we should live in defiance of whatever the Jew haters want.

trending calm's avatar

on Oct 8th, I demanded a mabul from God

Puck's avatar

"How the hell did anyone expect Israel to respond? "

Oh, probably the same way every other nation on earth has responded to armed attacks against the State.

The legal term is jus ad bellum. However, that applies only when International Law and the UN Charter matters, and they only apply to 193 UN member states minus one, of course. Those damn Jews. They always refuse to follow the rules.

"My response to October 7 was to move to Israel and purchase property in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank)"

Every time the phrase "the West Bank" is scratched on paper or falls out of the mouth of a Jew, it affirms Jordan's original intent to eliminate any connection to Jews. This change was approved and reaffirmed by the world at large eagerly embraced this change of status.

How can they be wrong ? Isn't it their very right and duty to dispense with the nuisance Law of Belligerent Occupation Article 43 of the 1907 Hague Regulations and Geneva Convention IV in which an occupier must respect the existing laws and institutions of the occupied area and maintain the status quo, prohibiting permanent legal or structural transformations? At least when it comes to Jews.

"This is our country and our story. It is our God-given, eternal right"

Not to mention the legal right first enshrined in the League of Nations and subsequently reiterated within the United Nations Charter.

And not to mention the secular right as articulated in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

But who is counting?

" we are restoring a vibrant community. That strength comes from Zionism"

One should always keep in mind that the Zionism commonly referred to today is political Zionism.

Zionism itself has taken many forms. Its singular goal was never merely to form a state. That is but one version. Underlying all its iterations over the 4,000 years of its existence is the expression of a People's connection to a land, and not just any land, but to their ancestral, indigenous lands defining the very essence of their Peoplehood.

It is the very same right the world acknowledges for all other ethnic land based peoples — to live unmolested in their historical, unceded territory.

Bart's avatar
1hEdited

"(Y)ou are a kapo." No. These Jews who, as you say, swallow, "the preposterous genocide claim" may be collaborators and traitors, but at least the camp kapos had the selfish and desperate belief they were saving or protecting themselves. These useful idiots, these low-life allies of the murderers, have no excuse other than their own self-loathing, voluntary stupidity, and moral emptiness.

Yonah E's avatar

You are correct!